Human-centred at heart. Business-minded by design.
All work
CCA / myedio · Personalised adaptive learning

Personalised learning.
With people in control.

Connecting learner needs, teacher judgement and digital learning tools for Commonwealth Charter Academy (CCA), a virtual school in Pennsylvania, USA.

K–12 educationExperience strategyService designHuman–AI interaction
A learner writing notes while learning with a teacher online
Conceptual illustration of the human promise: individual support helps learners build confidence.
PeopleStudents, teachers and families
Experience scopeLearning, teaching and authoring
EvidenceStrategy, workshops, journeys and UI
Case-study draft. This narrative brings together the supplied project artefacts. My individual leadership remit, delivery scope and measured outcomes are still being confirmed.
01 / Situation & tension

Different learning needs.
A shared experience to coordinate.

The stated ambition for myedio was a personalised learning experience that engages the family and helps learners succeed in school and in life. The materials include student and teacher personas, alongside concepts for dashboards, live classes and tools for content creation.

The adaptive-learning design had to account for learners who need prerequisite support, more practice or a greater challenge. Teachers needed ways to understand those needs and respond, while content authors needed to prepare the available pathways.

The central design tension was how to personalise support without making the experience harder to understand or taking control away from the teacher.

02 / Experience direction

Make the ambition actionable.

The roadmap connected the long-term ambition to a staged approach. The foundational phase focused on teachers and students, rule-based recommendations, a learning-object repository and analytics. Later phases proposed broader audiences and more advanced AI recommendations.

Design sprints, mock-up demonstrations and focus groups appeared along that roadmap. This made the sequence of learning and validation visible alongside the planned feature development.

Programme roadmap showing foundational, transformational and optimised phases, with design sprints and focus groups
A proposed phased roadmap; the document does not establish which releases shipped.
Leadership significance

The opportunity was to connect the experience promise to a credible sequence of decisions, validation activities and delivery priorities.

03 / Choices that shape the experience

Support the learner.
Keep the teacher’s judgement visible.

Decision 01

Explain recommendations and allow a choice.

The “More Time” concept shows teachers why support is recommended and lets them accept or reject it. The design also specifies logging the recommendation and the teacher’s action.

Decision 02

Plan for different learning speeds.

Flex Days create space in the course plan for prerequisite content, extra practice or a change of pace. Personalisation therefore extends into the course structure.

Decision 03

Make another attempt useful.

Retake and remediation concepts focus on knowledge gaps. Learners can request another attempt, while teachers can pair it with targeted support.

Recommendation concept showing teacher review, reasons for support and the learner notification
Teacher control and explanation are explicit parts of the recommendation concept.
The principles behind the interaction

The myedio principles call for assistance, simplicity, respect for values and improved efficiency. These support a design direction in which AI helps people act while preserving their agency.

myedio design principles and proposed assistant traitsmyedio, p. 4. Human-centred principles for the proposed assistant.
04 / From decisions to a connected system

Make the connections visible.

The student service blueprint maps the journey from orientation and prerequisite assessment through instruction, practice, support, honors and unit assessment. It brings automated scoring, teacher analysis and learning pathways into one view.

The PAL Cards workshop materials complement this with problem framing, idea generation, voting and prototype planning. The synthesis groups questions under navigation, grouping, placement and analytics.

Wide service blueprint connecting assessment, instruction, teacher decisions and adaptive learning pathways
Open the image to inspect the full journey.
Explore the workshop synthesis
PAL workshop synthesis with four themes: navigation, grouping, placement and analyticsWorkshop — PAL Cards, p. 26. A working synthesis, rather than evidence that every proposed activity or test was completed.
Leadership significance

The blueprint and workshop synthesis make dependencies and choices available for discussion across design, teaching, content and technology.

Original myedio dashboard screen
myedio dashboard screen.
Original myedio progress screen
myedio progress screen.

A shared visual foundation.

The brand guide documents global and status colours, grade-specific themes, typography, icons and reusable content and assessment components. It provides a common language across varied learning experiences.

Branding DS, pp. 1–10. Theme colours shown here from p. 2.

Design-system brand colours and four theme palettes

The experience extends beyond the lesson.

The wider work includes course progress, authoring tools and EdioLive video conferencing. The EdioLive document shows interface iterations and concepts for breakout rooms and private chat. These are connected teaching touchpoints within the supplied case-study bundle.

EdioLive classroom interface with participant and call controls
Live-classroom design.
Course-authoring interface for creating learning content
Course-authoring design.
05 / Feedback & implications

Flexibility also creates new questions.

The documented focus-group feedback supported learner-requested retakes and creative use of Flex Days. It also exposed important requirements: teachers wanted to apply support to groups, understand the cumulative workload across courses and avoid empty days for students who did not need additional practice.

The implication for the design is that a useful recommendation needs context. Supporting one topic cannot be considered in isolation from the learner’s wider schedule or the teacher’s workload.

Read the documented focus-group feedback
Focus-group feedback on retakes, group actions, workload across courses and flexible daysAdaptive Learning, p. 49. Qualitative feedback; participant count and research protocol are not provided in this extract.
06 / What the evidence establishes

A connected body of design work.

The supplied materials document an experience vision, personas and AI principles, a phased roadmap, workshop synthesis, a student service blueprint, interface concepts and a shared design system.

They also record qualitative feedback that can inform the next design decisions. They do not establish post-launch learning gains, adoption, time savings or commercial growth. Those outcomes will be added when verified, alongside my specific role and the contributions of the team.

The lesson for the leadership story

Personalisation requires coordination across the service: the support a learner receives, the decisions a teacher makes and the content the organisation can provide.

Source artefacts used in this story
  • myedio: vision, personas, Human–AI Interaction principles and interface examples, pp. 1–6.
  • Adaptive Learning: roadmap, feature definitions, teacher controls and focus-group feedback, pp. 3, 5–49.
  • Workshop — PAL Cards: sprint structure, synthesis and prototype concepts, pp. 1–36.
  • Blueprint: student service journey, p. 1.
  • Branding DS: visual foundations, themes and component guidance, pp. 1–10.
  • EdioLive: live-classroom exploration and interface iterations, p. 1.